Tyumen State University, Tyumen 625000, Russian Federation
The author raises the regulation's formation issues emerged in employing intellectual property in the context of digitalization of society based on a balance of interests of authors, copyright holders, users, society and the state. The purpose of the research is to formulate basic provisions to regulate copyright and intellectual property relations in the future.
The empirical research methods are: observation, experiment, measurement, interpretation; general scientific methods: axiomatic method, hypothetical-deductive analysis, synthesis, induction, abstraction, idealization and verbal modeling.
The results of the study are: it is proposed to revise the basics of intellectual property law based on the possibilities of the digital environment and self-regulation of relations in the field of intellectual property. Namely it is: recognition of the author's rights as inalienable natural rights, as well as recognition of citizens 'rights to access and use the intellectual products; the possibility of free use of intellectual products in the digital environment by users for non-commercial purposes, unless otherwise established by the author (copyright holder); the concept of a bona fide user; the right of the author to dispose the exclusive right for the intellectual product by transferring it to the public domain. These provisions create the basis for implementing the principle of balancing the interests of authors, copyright holders and society as a whole. And as a result the work achieves the correspondence of actual relations on the use of works in the digital environment and the rule of law, that is, law and order.
intellectual property, intellectual products, digital environment, balance of interests, principles, authors, copyright holders, users, legislation, legality, international norms, international treaties.
Gayduk V. P. The Evolution of Intellectual Property Law in the Digital Age. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 2, pp. 72—84. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.018
Andryushchenko E. S. Internet Relations: State Regulation and Self-Government. Cand. diss. Saratov, 2010. (In Russ.)
Bachilo I. L. Information law: the basics of practical informatics. Moscow, 2001. (In Russ.)
Dvoryankin O. Is Intellectual Property the Last Bastion of Well-Being? Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 2018, no. 9. (In Russ.)
Fleyshits E. A. Personal rights in the civil law of the USSR and capitalist countries. Moscow, 1941. (In Russ.)
Fogelson Yu. B. Soft Law in the Modern Legal Discourse. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2013, no. 5, pp. 37—48. (In Russ.)
Glushkov A. V. Problems of legal regulation in Internet. Cand. diss. thesis. St. Petersburg, 2007 (In Russ.)
Goloskokov L. V. Network Law Theory. Ed. by A. V. Mal'ko. St. Petersburg, 2006. (In Russ.)
Gorbunov V. A. The category of interest (person, society, state) in the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation. Cand. diss. thesis. Tyumen', 2007. (In Russ.)
Hua J. J. Toward a More Balanced Approach: Rethinking and Readjusting Copyright System in the Digital Network Era. Heidelberg, 2014.
Intellectual property is a stupid euphemism. Available at: http://geektimes.com/post/31587 (accessed 03.03.2019). (In Russ.)
Intellectual Property Law. Ed. by I. A. Bliznets. Moscow, 2014. (In Russ.)
Ivanov V. N. How to protect your rights and legitimate interests. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.)
Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85—102. DOI: 10.12737/ art_2018_1_7 (In Russ.)
Land M. Toward an International Law of the Internet. Harvard International Law Journal, 2013. Vol. 54.
Larry Lessig on how the law suppresses creativity. Available at: https://gradespatent. wordpress.com/2010/06/07 (accessed 03.03.2019). (In Russ.)
Lisitsa V. N. Intellectual Property Law. Novosibirsk, 2012. (In Russ.)
Litvinova S. F. A systematic approach to the study of law: homeostasis of legal regulation. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2013, no. 12. (In Russ.)
MacQueen H., Waelde Ch., Lauri G. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Oxford, 2010.
Mal'tsev G. V. Socialist law and individual freedom. Moscow, 1968. (In Russ.)
Marchenko M. N. The rule of law and civil society (theoretical and legal research). Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)
Matuzov N. I. Personality. Rights. Democracy: Theoretical Problems of Subjective Law. Saratov, 1972.
Nersesyants V. S. Law and Statute. From the history of legal doctrines. Moscow, 1983. (In Russ.)
Pevzner A. G. The concept and types of subjective civil rights. Uchenye zapiski VYuZI. Moscow, 1960. Iss. X. (In Russ.)
Podshibikhin L. Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Age. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 2005, no. 4. (In Russ.)
Prostakov S. There is no such thing as intellectual property. Available at: http://rusplt.ru/society/education/world/ciftolucija.html (accessed 03.03.2019). (In Russ.)
Rakhmatulina R. Sh., Sviridova E. A. Actual problems of intellectual property law. Moscow, 2018. (In Russ.)
Rasskazov L. P. Theory of State and Law: Advanced Course. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)
Senftleben M. Over protection and protection overlaps in IO Law — the need for horizontal fair use defenses. The Structure of IP Law. Ed. by A. Kur, V. Mizaras. Cheltenham; Northampton, 2011.
Shapiro J. Evolution: a view from the 21st century. 2012. Available at: http://bookre.org/reader?file =1432164 (accessed 07.06.2018).
Shaptsev V. A., Hartian D. Y. Informative parameters of the IT-infrastructure. Determination Experience 2017. SIBIRCON. 2017. 18—24 September. Novosibirsk. IEEE MCE, IEEE Xplore Digital Library. Available at: https://yadi.sk/d/zWfFHPkB3PSG4m (accessed 12.02.2019).
Shugurov M. International legal regimes of limitations and exceptions to copyright and related rights. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 2018, no. 12. (In Russ.)
Skorobogatov V. Yu. Self-regulation as a feature of the legal system. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.)
Subochev V. V. Legitimate interests. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.)
Sudarikov S. A. Intellectual Property Law. Moscow, 2014. (In Russ.)
Tikhomirov Yu. A. Law in the modern world: development vectors. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2017, no. 2. (In Russ.)
Voynikanis E. A. The Digital Intellectual Property Law: A Paradigm of Balance and Flexibility. Moscow, 2014. (In Russ.)
Zor'kin V. D. Civilization of law and development of Russia. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.)
Zor'kin V. D. Constitutional and legal development of Russia. Moscow, 2011. (In Russ.)
Full text in Russian