Law Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow 117198, Russian Federation
Despite a long history of discussing the relationship between the legal categories of intangible goods and non-property rights, the issue of systematizing intangible goods is far from being resolved. Modern society only aggravates it with the advent of virtual goods and an increase in interest in personal data. The article uses a systematic approach, in particular, the categorical tensor one. As a result of the study, a categorical-tensor approach is described, the place of intangible goods in the system of goods is considered, human benefits, public and natural benefits are highlighted. The attention is focused on the benefits of a person as a biological person, legal entity and mental producer. The definition of the legal category of a person is given, which refers to the categories that characterize the bodily (natural), legally significant social and mental productive properties of a person. It is shown that intangible goods must be considered as existing goods, and material goods should be considered as real goods. The systematization of civil law benefits is based on a categorical approach. The category “intangible” (“existing”) is studied from the reflection theory view point. The first version of the category-tensor model for systematizing intangible goods is substantiated and presented. The article argues that in a legally significant situation constitutional freedoms are subjective goods, constitutional rights are legal instrumental goods, and legitimate interests are objective goods. In the proposed categorical tensor model for systematizing intangible (existing) goods, there are three categorical axes that reflect existing goods in the form of human goods, legally significant situational goods (subject (freedom), object (interest) and/or instrumental (rights)), as well as existing productive goods.
The benefits of a legal entity are a social phenomenon whose properties must be considered through interdisciplinary perspective, i.e. as a multidimensional phenomenon, in particular, from the view point of the tensor approach. At the same time, the main element in this approach should be legal categories, as the most general characteristics of properties of goods — subject to the study. The extensive experience of the author in the field of forensic examination and the development of a general theory of examination allows us to hope that the results obtained can activate the discussion on the subject under discussion. The complexity of mental production benefits requires further research, especially information benefits as information products produced by a person, which (information) as meta-information includes personal information/messages called personal data.
systematization, classification, good, intangible, existing, subject, tool, object, category, tensor, legal.
Nesterov A. V. Legal Category of Intangible (Existing) Goods and Their Systematization. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 3, pp. 19—30. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.027 (In Russ.)
Amagyrov A. V. Peculiarities of legal protection of intangible benefits in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2016, no. 8, pp. 205—211. (In Russ.)
Blackstone W. Commentaries on the Laws of England. In Four Books. Oxford, 1765.
Braude I. L. On the subject of the object of legal relations under Soviet civil law. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1951, no. 3. (In Russ.)
Chernobel' G. T. Law as a measure of the social blessing. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 6, pp. 83—95. (In Russ.)
Dontsov D. S. The Body of a living person as an intangible benefit and civil protection of his physical integrity. Meditsinskoe pravo, 2011, no. 2, pp. 38—41. (In Russ.)
Efremova T. F. New dictionary of Russian language. Sensible-educational. Moscow, 2000. 1209 p.
Ermolova O. N. Intangible benefits: the essence and features of the legal structure. Tsivilist, 2012, no. 3. (In Russ.)
Fedotov D. V. The Doctrine of incorporeal property in the Anglo-Saxon legal system. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. Elektronnoe prilozhenie, 2012, no. 1, pp. 26—31. (In Russ.)
Gribanov V. P. Implementation and protection of civil rights. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2001. 411 p. (In Russ.)
Gurvich M. A. Civil procedural legal relations and procedural actions. Trudy VYuZI, vol. III. Moscow, 1965. (In Russ.)
Maleina M. N. The concept and types of intangible benefits as objects of personal non-property rights. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2014, no. 7. (In Russ.)
Mal'ko A. V. The Problem of the legitimate interests. Problems of theory of state and law. Ed. by M. N. Marchenko. Moscow, 2001. (In Russ.)
Matuzov N. I. Personality. Right. Democracy. Theoretical problems of subjective law. Saratov, 1972. (In Russ.)
Nesterov A. V. Expertise: General theory of expertise. Moscow, 2014. 261 p. (In Russ.)
Nesterov A. V. Originality and uniqueness of the content and the original. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, 2016, no. 4, pp. 4—8. (In Russ.)
Nesterov A. V. The Ratio of categories of reflection and display, as well as their relationship with the category of information. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 2: Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy. 2018, no. 3, pp. 1—5. (In Russ.)
Nokhrina M. L. Concept and characteristics of intangible property: the law and science of civil law. Pravovedenie, 2013, no. 5, pp. 143—160. (In Russ.)
Omel'chenko V. V. General theory of classification. Part I. Fundamentals of systems of knowledge of reality. Moscow, 2008. 436 p. (In Russ.)
Popa K. Theory of definition. Moscow, 1976. 245 p. (In Russ.)
Serebryakova A. A., Varyushin M. S. State legal regulation of the use of human tissues as special objects of civil law for the purposes of transplantation (comparative study). Meditsinskoe pravo, 2012, no. 2. (In Russ.)
Storme M. E. Property Law in a Comparative Perspective. London, 2004.
Trofimova T. V. The System approach to the classification of personal non-property rights in civil law. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo”, 2008, no. 3. (In Russ.)